Home > Return Code > Return Code 12 Reason Code 49

Return Code 12 Reason Code 49

MESSAGE IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING- NO DEVICE POOLS EXIST TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR TDSI SPECIFICATION IGD306I UNEXPECTED ERROR DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING RETURN CODE 12 REASON CODE 49 THE MODULE I got past the IGD306I error. Other 3590B to E migration issues: From text of APAR OW38975 NEW FUNCTION - D/T3590-E1X : Note: With this new function, it is now possible to have either 128 or 256 I was told the library manager was already ready to do encryption but I'll check that out. navigate here

Also included are enhancements that were made available through enabling PTFs that have been integrated into z/OS V1R12 DFSMS. So either way (default is SCRATCH then to PRIVATE, or default is PRIVATE), if it is going to end up PRIVATE, the exit needs to supply or verify that the recording It provides sufficient information so that you can start prioritizing the implementation of new functions and evaluating their applicability in your DFSMS environment. HesabımAramaHaritalarYouTubePlayHaberlerGmailDriveTakvimGoogle+ÇeviriFotoğraflarDaha fazlasıDokümanlarBloggerKişilerHangoutsGoogle'a ait daha da fazla uygulamaOturum açınGizli alanlarGrupları veya mesajları ara Skip to site navigation (Press enter) Tape mount difficulties Roberto Halais Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:26:25 -0800 Dear Listers:

It could be a H/W setup or microcode level problem. If I change the JCL to use UNIT=CART, it works just fine. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format.

But since all your existing TS1120 drives are already encryption-capable - no problem. Submit feedback to IBM Support 1-800-IBM-7378 (USA) Directory of worldwide contacts Contact Privacy Terms of use Accessibility The request cannot be fulfilled by the server Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Back to top krishnamohanBeginnerJoined: 07 Oct 2006Posts: 7Topics: 5 Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:40 am Post subject: Sorry to forget to thank you all guys who have posted. Code: QW IGD330I QW IGD306I Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: assuming you have Quickref installed_________________Utility

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any Back to top vkphaniIntermediateJoined: 05 Sep 2003Posts: 483Topics: 48 Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:07 am Post subject: Post your JCL. Any idea what I'm missing? RMM users can build a CLIST as follows: RMM SV VOLUME(*) OWNER(*) LIMIT(*) STATUS(MASTER) - LOCATION(libname) - CLIST('RMM CHANGEVOLUME ' , ' SPECIALATTRIBUTES(RDCOMPAT) ') .

Verify that the correct Data Class is being selected and that the ISMF definition is correct. . Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: and what is your JCL?_________________Utility and Program control cards are For instance, if you have upgraded all of your devices to a new model (3590 Model B -> 3590 Model E) and your data class still referenced the old recording technology, It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above.

In some cases an IPL, or an IML of the control unit or mainframe may be needed. Thank you guys for the reply. _________________Thanks & Regards, Krishna Mohan Reddy Back to top expatIntermediateJoined: 01 Mar 2007Posts: 458Topics: 9Location: Back in Bruxelles Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:51 am Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 6:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Rex, Did Also there are library manager changes needed to tell the library where to go to get the certs. _________________________________________________________________ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering [email protected] 1830 East Paris, Grand

It provides you with the information that you need to understand and evaluate the content of this DFSMS release, along with practical implementation hints and tips. check over here Thanks, Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Russell Witt Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Rex, If you have just upgraded your drives to a new recording technology, (this is especially important if all of the drives in your library have been upgraded) you may need to To save somebody else the headaches, I had neglected to rescan the tape drives at the controller level in the library after enabling encryption in the drives.

Previous by thread: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption Next by thread: Re: Redesigning the Principles of Operation Manual Index(es): Date Thread Flag as inappropriate (AWS) Security UNIX Linux Coding Usenet ArchiveAboutPrivacyImprint For DFSMS releases below R1F0, verify that you have the fix for APAR OW41005 as it corrects a problem with this ALTER command. . If it is the one you expect, display the Data Class definition in ISMF and look at the recording technology and/or media type specified. his comment is here If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner.

Just like Virtual-WORM and Replication. Now with this support, for media types MEDIA3 and MEDIA4, OAM will only set 128 track if the entry default use attribute is PRIVATE (set in field UXEUSEA) and no recording Back to top Nic CloustonAdvancedJoined: 01 Feb 2007Posts: 976Topics: 6Location: At Home Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:27 am Post subject: BTW - you have made 3 posts each starting a

References: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption From: Russell Witt Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption From: Pommier, Rex Prev by Date: Re: Batch Msgid Profile Next by Date: Re: How declare in

APAR status Closed as canceled. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may Bu kitaba önizleme yap » Kullanıcılar ne diyor?-Eleştiri yazınHer zamanki yerlerde hiçbir eleştiri bulamadık.Seçilmiş sayfalarSayfa 47Sayfa 31Sayfa 139Sayfa 126Sayfa 137İçindekilerChapter 1 zOS V112 DFSMS release overview1 Chapter 2 Catalog support7 Chapter We don't want to encrypt everything going to the TS1120s, but want to, for example, encrypt our backup tapes, but leave our HSM ML2 tapes unencrypted.

If the above displays are incorrect, check PSP buckets (like 3494DEVICE and 3590DEVICE) for missing maintenance. To update only the TCDB, you can use IDCAMS: Example: //ALTERVOL JOB ... //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=A //SYSIN DD * ALTER VAL0001 - VOLUMEENTRY - SATTR(RDCOMPAT) /* or "ALTER Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN . weblink Back to top vkphaniIntermediateJoined: 05 Sep 2003Posts: 483Topics: 48 Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:13 am Post subject: Type the below commands in your command line and hit enter, then you

Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in For example, you might see: IGD330I ERROR OCCURRED DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING- (msgIGD330I) NO DEVICE POOLS EXIST TO FULFILL REQUEST FOR TDSI SPECIFICATION IGD306I UNEXPECTED ERROR DURING CBRXLCS PROCESSING RETURN CODE 12 This is especially important if your library contains multiple device types. 2) For PRIVATE allocations, display the volume with: D SMS,VOL(volser) to determine which library the volume resides in, then display Even if a TS1120 is EJECTED (to go offsite) and is then returned (INSERTED) and the VOLCAT (TCDB) entry for that specific volume had been deleted after it had been EJECTED

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any For example if you have just upgraded from 128 track 3590 Model B drives to 256 track 3590 Model E drives and are not yet at R1F0, you may be missing Problem summary Problem conclusion Temporary fix Comments Info APAR APAR Information APAR numberII13276 Reported component nameV2 LIB INFO ITE Reported component IDINFOV2LIB Reported release001 StatusCLOSED CAN PENoPE HIPERNoHIPER Special AttentionNoSpecatt Submitted I am missing something else, then because when I run a very simple job to attempt to encrypt a tape, I get a JCL error as follows: 16.57.46 JOB03624 IRR010I USERID

If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. If you can't resolve the problem using the steps above, please collect the SYSLOG, JOBLOG, software LOGREC entry (logrec ID included in the IGD306I message) and take a dump of the Russell Witt On 11/12/14, Pommier, Rex wrote: Hi list, We have an existing 3584 tape library with encryption-capable TS1120 tape drives installed in it. Previously, only 128 was possible so during cartridge entry (of a previously unknown volser), prior to invoking the cartridge entry exit CBRUXENT, OAM would always set the recording technology (field UXEREC)

Any help would be greatly appreciated. So I thought maybe my ECART hadn't taken, so I tried changing the JCL to UNIT=JUNK (a non-existent ESOTERIC) and got a completely different error. //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* I'm sure it will be something of a head-slapper when it is pointed out to me, but for now I can't see the forest for the trees! Error description There are several variations of this error.

We haven't used encryption up to this point, but are trying to get encryption started.