Home > Connection Timed > Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux

Contents

Now let's see what BIND 9.2.3 was chocking on. ikrudolf, Mar 4, 2015 #9 ikrudolf Member Can you explain how to: you can also check the created bind zone file of thsi domain with named-checkzone script.Click to expand... Did Mad-Eye Moody actually die? Send me a private message if you would like me to setup your DNS for you for a price of your choosing. Check This Out

Seems kinda pointless don't ya think? l.google.com. 78359 IN NS a.l.google.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: a.l.google.com. 86019 IN A 216.239.53.9 b.l.google.com. 85119 IN A 64.233.179.9 c.l.google.com. 85119 IN A 64.233.161.9 e.l.google.com. 108 IN A 66.102.11.9 f.l.google.com. 8531 IN l.google.com. 78359 IN NS c.l.google.com. Newer Than: Search this thread only Search this forum only Display results as threads Useful Searches Recent Posts More...

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux

dig +time=10 www.microsoft.com If that timed out, I want to see the results of the following command. akadns.net. 124662 IN NS use1.akadns.net. Forum Statistics Discussions: 54,300 Messages: 287,715 Members: 92,378 Latest Member: bdebolt Share This Page Tweet Howtoforge - Linux Howtos and Tutorials Home Forums > ISPConfig 3 > Installation/Configuration > English | com. 172800 IN NS j.gtld-servers.net.

A rude security guard Why wasn't the Imperial Pilot in Rogue One made insane or affected? com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. ;; Received 489 bytes from 202.12.27.33#53(202.12.27.33) in 6128 ms dhl.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.dhl.com. com. 172800 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net. Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Redhat Visit the following links: Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All rights reserved Home Forums Articles Badges Privacy Policy Support Sitemap Newsletter Signup Free Web Developer Tools

UbuntuCommunityAsk!DeveloperDesignDiscourseHardwareInsightsJujuShopMore ›AppsHelpForumLaunchpadMAASCanonical current community chat Ask Ubuntu Ask Ubuntu Meta your If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. com. 161626 IN NS M.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. I have no idea which end is the problem, but what does /etc/resolv.conf contain on the client?

Click on the link "toggle.www.ms.akadns.net" to resolve it. Centos Nslookup Connection Timed Out Trying Next Origin IN A ;; Query time: 7997 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.30.21#53(einstein) ;; WHEN: Wed Aug 24 17:04:52 2005 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 35 But the Bind 9.2.3 server did not: dig +time=10 Currently I have a CentOS virtual machine as well as a Lubuntu virtual machine both running in VMware workstation (this is my test environment before I implement them on actual hardware).I com. 172800 IN NS L.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu

Since xmail2 can, and it appears to be on the same subnet, is there a restriction on the firewall that is allowing DNS traffic (UDP port 53) only to xmail2? ngw.dhl.com.edgesuite.net. 8520 IN CNAME a1085.g.akamai.net. Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux I ran "dig www.microsoft.com" on my box (with BIND 9.3.0) just now and it took a staggering 2.6 seconds to resolve on the first try. Nslookup Connection Timed Out Trying Next Origin nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2015042501 1800 900 604800 86400 ;; Received 106 bytes from 192.112.36.4#53(192.112.36.4) in 74 ms Running named-checkzone against my zone files all checks out as it should but queries to either

It might be a router/firewall, in which case, this won't work. http://chatflow.net/connection-timed/can-you-see-me-connection-timed-out.html Jun 13 17:00:00 xmail1 avahi-daemon[1979]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.1.21. Not the answer you're looking for? nl. 172800 IN NS sns-pb.isc.org. Connection Timed Out; No Servers Could Be Reached Bind

Home Forum Today's Posts | FAQ | Calendar | Community Groups | Forum Actions Mark Forums Read | Quick Links View Site Leaders | Unanswered Posts | Forum Rules Articles Marketplace By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Now, you may have seen different results. this contact form Why didn't microsoft just CNAME to lb1.www.ms.akadns.net in the first place?

Jun 13 18:03:17 xmail1 kernel: tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX. Nslookup No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu Jun 13 16:59:56 xmail1 kernel: IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver Jun 13 16:59:56 xmail1 kernel: sit0: Disabled Privacy Extensions Jun 13 16:59:56 xmail1 kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jun I am speculating that the delay is an attempt by the route command to do the inverse lookup of the IP addresses.) dkm999 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View

Find More Posts by dkm999 06-13-2008, 11:26 PM #3 jpbarto Senior Member Contributing Member Registered: Mar 2003 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Distribution: Gentoo / NetBSD Posts: 1,251 Rep: easy way

com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. Jun 13 16:59:59 xmail1 kernel: tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX. I'll post the result from: dig +tcp www.redhat.com on my original question for you to check. –dragonov7 Dec 4 '14 at 22:04 1 I am running the all tests from Dig Couldn T Get Address For No More eth0 is facing the internet and eth1 is facing an internal network.

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed The time now is 04:32 AM. current community blog chat Server Fault Meta Server Fault your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. navigate here Let me know if any other information is required.

Jun 12 20:11:16 xmail1 system-config-network[2108]: ln //etc/sysconfig/networking/devices//ifcfg-eth0 //etc/sysconfig/networking/profiles//default/ifcfg-eth0 Jun 12 20:11:17 xmail1 system-config-network[2108]: ln //etc/sysconfig/network-scripts//ifcfg-eth1 //etc/sysconfig/networking/devices//ifcfg-eth1 Jun 12 20:11:17 xmail1 system-config-network[2108]: Linking eth1 to devices and putting it in profile default. Browse other questions tagged bind dig or ask your own question. Top WhatsHisName Posts: 1534 Joined: 2005/12/19 20:21:43 Location: /earth/usa/nj Re: Client not recieving DNS information through DHCP Quote Postby WhatsHisName » 2012/01/25 19:37:52 Why not cut out the middleman and ask Maybe BIND 9.2.3 just plain chokes - or maybe your named.conf has some strange configuration options in it.